"Disease is the body's escape valve, for when everyday, routine processes of elimination are no longer adequate. It's fundamentally an essential, curative process." - Shawn Siegel

"The proffered reasons to vaccinate are, in reality, a web of misinformation and social coercion. Time to clean house." - Shawn Siegel

Vaccination isn't immunization. It's bastardization of the immune process. Vaccines don't prevent disease. In many, if not most cases, what they prevent is a natural response to the disease after subsequent exposure; disallowing the display of traditional symptoms --in some cases all symptoms-- while likely still allowing transmission. The disease goes unrecognized --thus unreported-- creating the illusion of disease prevention.

The skew is even more acute in the case of chickenpox. It's only since the use of the varicella vaccine that babies have begun developing shingles --a more painful and longer lasting illness that's a reactivation of the varicella virus-- which, before the vaccine, was reserved exclusively for middle aged adults and older. The vaccine has advanced the display of shingles by decades.

The Vaccine Myth Radio Program: All shows are at Logos Radio Network Archive but with no guest/topic info listed. Please support the show via PayPal.

The Original MMR Vaccine Package Insert Lists Autism as a Known Side Effect

Vaccines don't immunize

...they bastardize. They interfere with the proper, protective / recuperative immune response to the respective diseases after subsequent exposures. Had you never heard of vaccination, and someone walked up to you and offered to inject disease into your infant baby, your initial response, your gut reaction, would be the correct one. We know from a study published by the FDA that once vaccinated for whooping cough, if you're then exposed to the disease you're prone to developing an asymptomatic infection - you won't know you're sick, but you'll be able to infect everyone around you, including that infant you supposedly were protecting by vaccinating, for six weeks. We know from other studies that if you're vaccinated for measles and then exposed, there's a good chance you'll develop a subclinical case - you'll experience fever and respiratory symptoms, but not the rash. The eye-opener is that measles without rash in childhood is associated with degenerative bone disease, certain tumors and other chronic disorders in adulthood. The entire purpose of the process we call infectious illness has been turned on its ear by the vaccine industry, turned into a source of fear, when it in reality is an essential system of detoxification, eliminating infection, cleansing and returning the body to homeostasis, to wellness, when needed. Indeed, pediatricians surveyed by the AAP stated that they were told by many moms that their child was in better health after a bout with the measles than before - the illness had been cathartic.

All the above speaks only to the disease antigens in vaccines. When you consider the other ingredients, the known neurotoxins - literal poisons - carcinogens and other chemicals, none of which belong in the human bloodstream, the paradigm arguably becomes a program of genocide. As for autism, the syndrome is defined by behaviors - loss of speech, stimming, loss of eye contact and so on - all of which can be and are caused by brain dysfunction, while we're told by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on their website that both the MMR and DTaP / Tdap vaccines can cause brain inflammation and brain damage, and we know from the historical record that the Hep B vaccine can, as well.

Vaccination is an abomination. Stop vaccinating, and research, earnestly, but outside the CDC / mainstream box. Look for honest information. You will never vaccinate again.

Reclaim your instincts

At the pediatrician's office, whilst helping hold our babies down for vaccinations, we've abandoned our instincts; we override the gut feeling that we should not be doing what we're doing, based on a constant stream of information from trusted sources; we've chosen information over instinct. The choice is not a good one. The information we've been given is terribly misleading; the sources, untrustworthy. We've been seduced into a false reality.

Had we never heard of vaccination, and someone suggested we inject disease into our babies, we'd spurn the idea, and perhaps the person. But we've learned, we've been taught, to simply assume that the paradigm works; that the theory of vaccination is sound; that vaccines are safe and effective; and, most recently, that the vaccinated protect those around them.

Vaccines aren't safe. The government maintains a list of acknowledged vaccine injuries, dependent upon the respective shots: brain damage; convulsions; chronic arthritis; anaphylactic shock; paralytic polio, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; brachial neuritis; intussusception, and all the complications and aftereffects associated with those injuries. To date $3 billion has been awarded in compensation for vaccine injuries, beyond the above mentioned including: Guillain Barré Syndrome; transverse myelitis; neuromyelitis optica; chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; ventricular fibrillation; cardiac arrest; and death.

That's a partial list.

Vaccines aren't safe.

Many parents are aware of at least some of the risks, yet vaccinate, simply believing it's safe in the sense that it just won't happen to their kids. There's no sound reason for that belief. Kids and adults alike have suffered severe damage from vaccination, including death, despite a track record of apparent non-reaction to previous shots. The toxins from vaccines accumulate, shot to shot, and any subsequent vaccine can push a person's tolerance past the breaking point, or introduce a new ingredient for which no tolerance exists.

Beyond the stated and terrible list of injuries, are scores of lesser vaccine effects: upper and lower respiratory infections, sleep apnea, ear infections, facial tics, and many more.

Vaccines simply aren't safe.

Vaccines aren't effective.

There is a long history of statistical manipulation on the part of the vaccine industry, carried out to create the public perception of reduction in disease incidence, where none exists, the most blatant example and, ironically, also one of the two most touted: polio. Diagnostic bias also plays a role in the illusion of disease reduction. In measles outbreaks, for instance, there have been instances where all the kids involved were vaccinated, and some in which few were vaccinated. The point: when an MD's presented with a child with an actual case of measles, the likelihood that the child was vaccinated is 50/50. Yet, doctors are taught that if the child's vaccinated, measles is very unlikely, and will lean toward diagnosing something like roseola instead, which includes a rash that often mirrors measles. The most insidious reason for the illusion of vaccine effectiveness, however, is the true effect of the existence of artificial antibodies. That is, antibodies produced as a result of the artificial, unnatural exposure that is vaccination. These have been adequately shown to interfere with the natural immunological reaction to potential pathogens after subsequent exposure, and to allow asymptomatic or atypically symptomatic infection, which not only masks the actual disease, which therefore, undetected, goes unreported, but can leave the infected a Trojan horse, able to surreptitiously infect others, for an undetermined period of time.

Vaccines protect no one, least of all the vaccinated, for all the reasons stated above, and more. Diseases manifest to a purpose: to thoroughly cleanse the body of infection and attendant cellular waste. We know that the vaccinated can develop a measles infection without the rash; that the skew in response can result in ruminating intracellular infection; which in turn can lead to degenerative diseases, tumors and other chronic disorders later in life. Vaccinated kids can develop asymptomatic whooping cough infections and infect others for six weeks. We must assume the same type of scenario can apply to other diseases as well. It's been well demonstrated that vaccinated kids can still experience mumps, for instance, but must consider the possibility that they can also develop a mumps infection without the typical swelling of the parotids. But traditionally symptomatic mumps has been shown to be protective against ovarian cancer, so it follows that for some kids an atypically symptomatic case will forfeit that protection. Cases of chickenpox in vaccinated kids are termed breakthrough, as though overcoming the sturdy protection of the vaccine, and attendant studies point out that not only are the number of pox in such instances reduced, but in some cases they never even reach the vesicular stage. The vesicular stage, however, is the fruition of the cleanse, and failure to reach it likely an indication of a truncated, unproductive response, rather than a sign of the benefit of vaccination.

The idea that the unvaccinated are any more of a threat in any way than the vaccinated is simply illogical, silly, were it not for the divisiveness of the notion. Various hospitals advise immunocompromised patients to avoid contact with anyone recently vaccinated with a live vaccine, and make no mention of the unvaccinated whatsoever, because there's no reason to mention them. Anyone, vaccinated or not, can develop an infection, and sometime during the typical incubation period of three or four days to a week or more begin infecting others, surreptitiously. Soon thereafter symptoms will begin to display, and appropriate precautions can be taken, both by the infected and those around them. that's the natural course of disease contraction and transmission. In those cases where the existence of vaccine-induced antibodies skew the immune response, however, traditional symptoms simply won't display, and surreptitious transmission of the infection can continue well past the typical incubation period.

Beyond that, anyone, vaccinated or not, can transmit a potential pathogen to someone else. We all are constantly exposed to potentially pathogenic organisms, and, regardless of whether we ourselves become infected, can transmit them to others, through breath and through touch.

Vaccines protect no one.

A benign disease is one which is generally without complications, and a good prognosis, or outcome, is usual. Withdraw from the hyperbole of mainstream vaccine propaganda, research, and you'll find that the diseases against which vaccines supposedly protect are almost universally benign.

Research.

Educate.

Reclaim your instincts.

Share the above on Facebook

Trust.

There are few things in life more awesome than a mother's protective instinct. What follows is dedicated to that love, and the power of discernment that accompanies it.

If vaccines were advertised on television, an ad for, for instance, the DTaP vaccine, would have to include the following, accurate disclaimer:

The above disclaimer is based on the information provided in the manufacturers' own inserts (1), a search on the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for officially recorded reactions (2), and information on macrophagic myofasciitis, a syndrome related specifically to injected aluminum adjuvant (3,4), an ingredient in the DTaP (5). Still, it is incomplete, for it is a fact that many adverse vaccine reactions are never reported to VAERS; technically a mandatory system, but with no provision for penalty for non-compliance - if for no other reason than the reluctance or refusal of doctors to acknowledge vaccine-induced illness. Unfortunately, ads for the other vaccines would be similar.

The list is also incomplete because it comprises only the most often reported DTaP reactions, but though it's not at the top of the list, death, the kingpin of adversity, is also recorded.

Many of the injuries for which the national vaccine court has awarded a total of over $2.7 billion over the years, were, indeed, DTaP-related, typically involving vaccine-induced epileptic seizures and other neurologic disorders, in some cases resulting in death. To quote from the court records in one such case: "Within one day [of the DTaP vaccination], he developed a fever, which led to a complex febrile seizure. Subsequently, [the child] developed epilepsy. This fact pattern is commonly seen in the Vaccine Program." (6)

This fact pattern is commonly seen in the Vaccine Program. Why, then, is this "fact pattern" not common knowledge? Government public health entities, the medical profession, pharmaceutical companies and the mainstream media; they all play their role in guarding the health of the nation, and, to varying degrees, they are all aware of the VAERS reports, the vaccine inserts on which the manufacturers list the historical adverse reactions to their products, and the billions of dollars that have been awarded for vaccine injury.

This should be a disturbing reality for any parent; vaccine injury --much of it serious, some of it catastrophic, and some of it fatal-- is a reality, yet neither the government, the pharmaceutical companies, the medical profession nor the mainstream media has stepped up to the plate to declare that vaccination is not actually "safe", as it is described. According to Merriam-Webster (7), "safe" means, free from harm or risk; secure from threat of danger, harm or loss. That's also what it means to those millions of parents who, having been told repeatedly that vaccines are safe, naturally assume they can do no harm. But vaccination can result in childhood diabetes - it is not "safe"; vaccination can cause epilepsy, as has been ruled by the vaccine court - it is not free from risk; it is not "safe". As recorded in VAERS by medical doctors, vaccination can induce autism or disintegrative disorder, in the process transforming forever family life. That is not freedom from harm. That is not "safe".

There is a terrible dichotomy between the information we as parents should expect from all the above-named sources, and what they give us, especially when you consider that there's not a doctor, pharmaceutical researcher or CVS pharmacist who can tell you, on a per-vaccination basis, whether your child will be susceptible to injury from the next administered vaccine, regardless of vaccination history; because they don't know. Given the severity of the illnesses that can result from vaccines? There's a terrible dichotomy between the information we as parents should demand from our health information sources, vs. what they give us.

This is a matter of trust. We don't even know the real extent of the adverse reactions associated with the vaccines they ask us to inject into our children. There is no doubt that the actual number of reactions is many times the number recorded in VAERS; the only question is, how many? 10 times?; 100 times? Our medical authorities are quick to point out that correlation isn't causation; that, just because a reaction is temporally associated with a vaccination does not prove one was caused by the other. Their assumption that they can even offer such a rationale is unacceptable. They are public servants; when in asking us to vaccinate they ask us to subject our kids to the possibility of diabetes, learning disorder, epilepsy, death! We demand they be straightforward in their reportage about the associated risks, make no assumptions and offer no rationales.

This is a matter of trust, and there is no question here. The CDC, the FDA, the nation's department of Health and Human Services, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, state health agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, some doctors (would it were all of them!) and many journalists are well aware that there are extreme and catastrophic vaccine reactions, and that many more thousands of vaccine recipients are going to suffer them, yet, with a few notable exceptions, they say nothing; more egregiously, in literally portraying vaccination as safe they knowingly mischaracterize it. They not only betray our trust, they show it great disdain.

It's not that diseases can't be seriously damaging; it's that the choice as to whether your child will be exposed to severe risk from vaccines is yours, not theirs. Your decision cannot be informed, because they will not tell the whole truth. Moreover, if they snub their noses at their responsibility to give us complete information in one area of vaccination, we cannot trust them to be truthful in other areas: vaccine history; vaccine effectiveness; and the true nature of the threat of disease. They can only be trusted to advance the vaccination paradigm.

Investigate. Research. They're your kids.

Beyond essential, emergency care, the medical system --mainstream, allopathic medicine-- is rotten to the core. It was created by a hierarchy interested only in forwarding the sales of its pharmaceutical divisions, and the evidence is all too compelling that monetary greed has been usurped by even darker motivations. The only saving grace is the good will of most of its practitioners, and that's all too often hamstrung by the various systemic coercions, from plain old job security to the same cognitive dissonance experienced by so much of the general public; an understandable terribly unfortunate inability to entertain the notion that their educations were not only seriously deficient, but corrupt. There's no excuse for the medical establishment teaching nothing about nutrition in medical school. The fundamental definition of a doctor is a healer, and you can't heal the body if you don't know how the body heals. There's no excuse for the medical establishment teaching nothing about the reality, nature or extent of vaccine damage in medical school, to the very doctors upon whom we are then told to rely to fully inform our vaccine decisions. A white coat and a stethoscope do not a healer make. We're beyond asking questions. We must educate ourselves. - Shawn Siegel

References:

1. http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_infanrix.pdf
2. http://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
3. http://springerlink.com/content/mqq7u37k410vrn27
4. http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20071206.htm
5. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
6. http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/01/cbs-covers-court-award-for-dtap-whooping-cough-vaccine-death.html
7. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/safe

More powerful commentaries from Shawn Siegel:

May 25, 2014: The Great Divide: Spanning the Chasm Between Truth and Egregious Lies
Oct 19, 2013: Revelations
Sep 19, 2013: Disinformed Consent
Recent articles at Facebook.com/shawn.siegel.7/notes
Older articles at TheVaccineMyth.wordpress.com

The Vaccine Debate

The reasoning behind the so-called vaccine debate is illusory. We have a cascade of misinformation thrown at us by the government, the medical establishment, the media and the manufacturers - who pretty much stay out of the picture themselves, allowing our supposed public health services and the media to propel the paradigm, to do their dirty work - all based at the root on statistical manipulation and withholding of critical information; and we have the truth, as best they can determine it, brought to us by people whose primary interest actually *is* the health of their kids.

Hate to sound like an inquisitor, but this is indeed a sincerity trial, and all we have to do is look at the CDC's Verstraeten study to determine that the only sincerity in the hearts of those who control the CDC was their sincere effort to cover up the study's damning finding: that mercury's indeed directly, significantly associated with speech and learning disorders and autism. And make no mistake about it; the effort was sincere. They re-formatted the collected data multiple times, over two years, each time resulting in a less statistically significant correlation, until they were able to announce that no correlation had been found. It was a purposeful, sustained effort to withhold from American parents the evidence that vaccinating their kids was an horrible mistake, and that's such an incredible and obvious slap in the face, to everyone.

That's all you need to know - at least, for starters - to take you aback. Anyone who can avoid speaking to this, or to so many similar deep breaches of the public trust, and continue to spout the "provax" message either has a terrible case of cognitive dissonance, or worse - much worse - and it's always so apparent. - Shawn Siegel

A Terribly Unnatural Act

A dispassionate, reflective look at the act of vaccination reveals a procedure outside the auspices of the elegant, unreproducible immune system bequeathed each of us by Mother Nature. A terribly unnatural act in its route of introduction, greatly exacerbated by the insane list of toxic ingredients. Circumventing a variety of circulatory system safeguards, it opens us up, for starters, to the flow of nuerotoxins through the blood brain barrier, and to changes in the viscosity of the blood itself, resulting in impeded capillary flow, leading to oxygen and nutrient deprivation to the tissues of vital organs and degradation of their function. The result? The most bizarre, criminal tradeoff in the history of Mankind; what in any adequately fed and housed population are the relatively minor, temporary symptoms of acute infectious disease, for vaccine injuries:

Anaphylaxis, a severe, whole-body reaction to vaccine ingredients; encephalopathy, brain damage; brachial neuritis, a degree of loss of sensation to the shoulders, arms, hands, and chest, which can be accompanied by chronic pain, lasting years; chronic arthritis; Thrombocytopenic purpura, a loss of blood platelets resulting in "increased tendency to bleed", an autoimmune disorder caused by the production of antibodies against platelet antigens; Guillain-Barré Syndrome; radial nerve injury; transverse myelitis; Kleine-Levin Syndrome, a neurological disorder characterized by recurring periods of excessive amounts of sleep and altered behavior; sepsis, a potentially fatal whole-body inflammation; demyelinating condition, which damages the myelin sheath protecting the transmission of signals in neurons - nerve cells - resulting in loss of sensation, movement, cognition, or other functions, depending on which nerves are involved; Opsoclonus Myoclonus Syndrome, a neurological disorder that appears to be the result of an autoimmune process involving the nervous system, some of the symptoms of which are unpredictable eye movement and impairment of speech and of comprehension of speech; Bilateral Symmetric Diaphragmic Palsy, which affects the nerves that provide both sensory and motor function to the diaphragm, controlling respiration; multiple sclerosis; Bell's palsy; cardiac arrest; and death - and that's just a partial list.

Side effects, my ass. Those are the effects of vaccines. The myriad lesser vaccine induced disorders are runoff from the profound nature of those listed above.

Medical treason

Dr. Fred Klenner, MD, was curing cases of polio with injections of vitamin C well before the advent of the Salk vaccine. The medical establishment was certainly aware of the success, for Dr. Klenner had announced and described it at a 1949 AMA conference, yet the American public wasn't made aware of the treatment, and in the headlines it deserved, for this was when the polio fright was beginning to reach its zenith. To this day, officialdom won't mention it - you have to be told by your digital neighbors, or good doctors like nephrologist Suzanne Humphries.

MD Dr. Thomas Levy was astounded when he read the history, and at the page linked in the first comment below described one particularly incredible case:

In 1951, Dr. Klenner, MD, treated a five-year-old girl stricken with polio. She'd already been paralyzed in both her lower legs for over four days - the right leg was completely limp, and the left leg was determined to be 85% flaccid. Pain was noticed especially in the knee and lumbar areas. Four consulting physicians confirmed the diagnosis of polio. Other than massage, vitamin C was the only therapy initiated. After four days of vitamin C injections the child was again moving both legs, but with only very slow and deliberate movement. Klenner also noted that there was a "definite response" after only the first injection of vitamin C. The child was discharged from the hospital after four days, and 1,000 mg of oral vitamin C was continued every two hours with fruit juice for seven days. The child was walking about, although slowly, on the 11th day of treatment. By the 19th day of treatment there was a "complete return of sensory and motor function," and no long-term impairment ever resulted. Vitamin C not only completely cured this case of polio, it completely reversed what would undoubtedly have been a devastating, crippling result for the remainder of this girl's life.

Dr. Levy adds: For such elegant results, in the days before widespread use of either antibiotics or vaccination, one may wonder why Klenner was not awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine.

One may wonder, indeed - or one may feel justified anger that a proven effective treatment for an illness that was disabling so many kids was never made public; or that, instead, a conscious campaign of deceit was mounted to create the illusion that the vaccine eliminated the disease.

Dr Stephan Lanka has offered a large sum of money to anyone who can prove that a "measles" virus exists. No proof submitted yet! As we have learned from Dr Humphries, the "polio" virus was invented as a scapegoat to divert attention from the health problems caused by exposure to DDT. More recently the "zika" virus was used as a scapegoat to divert attention from the real cause of the microcephaly caused by exposure to a larvacide sprayed over drinking water sources in remote areas of Brazil. The 14 scientists in Dr Gary Null's documentary have exposed that that there is no proof that HIV exists. Now, Sofia Smallstorm and Joe Imbriano finally put the nail in the coffin of the viral theory of disease! What a relief to finally learn that there is no scientific reason to fear viruses. Health comes from clean living, proper nutrition, fresh air, sunshine, and a positive frame of mind. It's shocking to realize that the vaccine industry earns $50 billion/year selling fear of a phantom that doesn't exist.