Shawn Siegel: Friendly Fire
Squalene is found in each of us, produced by the liver. (1) It's an essential molecule, a precursor of cholesterol (2), which is a component of cell membranes. (3) If the body develops antisqualene antibodies, deep and ruminating problems can result.
Preceding the first Gulf War, all support troops were given the anthrax vaccine, but five of the batches contained squalene, as detected by the FDA. Fully one fourth of the 750,000 troops involved ultimately developed Gulf War Syndrome, and in each of those tested who were known to have received the anthrax vaccine from one of the contaminated batches, antisqualene antibodies were detected. Moreover, in the late 90's four members of the Air Force who were scheduled for the shot, who knew about the reputation of the dangers of the vaccine but who nevertheless had decided to obey orders and consent to the vaccination, volunteered to be tested, before and after, for antisqualene antibodies: none was found before the shot; three of the four showed the antibodies after the shot. (4)
I have reliable evidence that the fourth airman ultimately developed them as well.
The Army initially denied outright the presence of squalene in the vaccine. After government testing detected the five batches containing it, the Army claimed that the anthrax bacteria must have produced it, but the concentrations of squalene in the five batches revealed the hand of man - they in essence doubled from batch to batch - from 4 ppb to 64 ppb - which is standard industry protocol when testing a vaccine, to double a specific constituent, ostensibly to determine where lay the greatest efficacy.
The contamination was conscious; purposeful.
Gulf War Syndrome has driven many to suicide, and you'll plainly see why when you view the short film linked below (5), Direct Order, narrated by Michael Douglas.
Two years ago the suggestion was made that children should be administered the anthrax vaccine. Several ethics panels kicked the issue back and forth, a hot potato, ultimately recommending that testing begin on 18-year olds and up, and based on the results of those tests, they would then determine whether it were acceptable to begin trials on kids. (6)
These people will stop at nothing.
