CA SB 276 Replaces the doctor-patient relationship with government imposed one-size-fits-all vaccination mandates. Call to oppose SB 276.
New York Law Authorizes Internment Camps
“Upon determining by clear and convincing evidence that the health of others is or may be endangered by a case, contact or carrier, or suspected case, contact or carrier of a contagious disease that, in the opinion of the governor, after consultation with the commissioner, may pose an imminent and significant threat to the public health resulting in severe morbidity or high mortality, the governor or his or her delegee, including, but not limited to the commissioner or the heads of local health departments, may order the removal and/or detention of such a person or of a group of such persons by issuing a single order, identfying such persons either by name or by a reasonably specific description of the individuals or group being detained. Such person or group of persons shall be detained in a medical facility or other appropriate facility or premises designated by the governor or his or her delegee and complying with subdivision five of this section.“
Full text of law
Ray Andrew, MD: Where are the Long-Term Safety Studies?
"I am running into increasing numbers of patients who decline to receive vaccinations. I don't call them "antivaxxers" because that is the most immature way I can imagine to refer to another human being with an opinion, whether I consider it informed or not. Name-calling is what people do in politics when they don't have an intelligent response to an opposing party's argument. This is supposed to be science, not politics.
Based on my experience, those who choose not to vaccinate care just as much about their children as you and I do. But they are looking for information. They no longer consider the AAP and the CDC as unbiased sources of information because the former has ties to the drug industry and the latter actually owns vaccine patents. These parents want me to show them long-term safety studies, which I am unable to find.
They are bothered by the ingredient lists of vaccines, knowing that there are EPA-listed toxins in many of them. Some don't like knowing that cells and DNA from aborted fetuses as well as animals are used in vaccine production. Some demand true double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled (using saline controls, not adjuvants) trials proving efficacy, which simply do not exist, even though we keep telling everyone that this is the gold standard in medicine. Some ask why—if informed consent exists for every other procedure in medicine—doctors and governments are trying to force vaccination on them, throwing informed consent (a legal right, I was taught) out the window. Some make the argument that, if vaccines are so effective, the vaccinated shouldn't worry about getting sick from the unvaccinated. And they ask me for scientific proof of the theory of herd immunity. I don't remember being shown any evidence of this in medical school. It was simply taught as a self-evident fact. But my patients don't accept that anymore, not without seeing some proof.
So, when I receive all of these communications from different state health organizations telling me how I am supposed to combat the growing threat of vaccine deniers, I feel like a straw man because these communications never present actual evidence to respond to the questions of these parents. They're just talking points, empty claims, and official pronouncements. In conclusion, some of my patients vaccinate, and some don't. I respect both kinds. They are both intelligent and care for their children. Last I checked, the Hippocratic oath doesn't require me to insult people with whom I don't agree. I present what evidence I can find, and let them choose based on their values, not mine. Maybe that's not allowed anymore. Maybe I'm supposed to kick them out of my practice if they disagree with me. Maybe they should be kicked out of school. Out of the country, even. If that's the America of the future, that's not a country I would want to live in.” -Dr. Ray Andrew, MD
Vaccine-Associated Uveitis can Lead to Blindness
The term "uveitis" is used because the diseases often affect a part of the eye called the uvea. Nevertheless, uveitis is not limited to the uvea. These diseases also affect the lens, retina, optic nerve, and vitreous, producing reduced vision or blindness.
All of the widely administered vaccines have been reported to cause uveitis. The ocular inflammation is usually temporary and resolves with topical ocular steroids. During a 26-year period, a total of 289 cases of vaccine-associated uveitis were reported to three adverse reaction reporting databases. Hepatitis B vaccine, either alone or administered with other vaccines, appears to be the leading offender. Clinicians are encouraged to report cases of vaccine- or drug-associated ocular adverse reactions to www.eyedrugregistry.com
Disease prevention by means of vaccination is one of public health’s greatest successes.2,3 But the benefits of vaccines also carry the potential for a wide variety of side effects. Cases of uveitis in association with vaccine administration have been reported with nearly all vaccines.4,5 To examine the occurrence of vaccine-associated uveitis, we collected data on cases of vaccine-associated uveitis reported to three spontaneous reporting databases on adverse drug events. More
Intro to Vaccine Safety Science and Policy in the United States
Until a frank conversation is possible regarding vaccine safety, children susceptible to vaccine injury will not be protected from such injury. Nor will children injured by vaccines be able to access the services they need. We can do better in protecting and serving children who are susceptible or succumb to serious injuries from vaccination.
The first step in avoiding vaccine injuries and helping those already harmed is understanding the state of vaccine safety science and policy in the United States. This white paper from ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) provides this under-standing and highlights areas in need of improvement.
Section “I” discusses how Congress granted pharmaceutical companies immunity from liability for vaccine injuries and transferred all responsibility for vaccine safety to the United States Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and its agencies, including the Food & Drug Administration
(FDA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Section “II” discusses how most pediatric vaccines were licensed based on inadequate clinical trials, including follow-up periods too brief to capture adverse outcomes, and illegitimate placebos (e.g., other vaccines).
Section “III” discusses the CDC’s deficient post-licensure vaccine safety surveillance.
Section “IV” discusses the conflicts of interest at HHS regarding vaccine safety, including the issues resulting from placing HHS in charge of vaccine safety and the conflicting duty of promoting and defending vaccines against any claim of injury.
Download or read PDF at ICAN