vaccine-injury.info  

Unvaccinated children are the healthiest
Tweet
The Vaccine Myth Radio Program
Vaccines: 100% Snake Oil
Fearless Parent Radio
Print Friendly, Email or Save as PDF

Population studies universally show that vaccinated populations experience more disease outbreaks than those with no vaccinations. In a 1992 New Zealand study comparing 226 vaccinated to 229 unvaccinated children, the results overwhelmingly showed that the unvaccinated children suffered far less from chronic childhood illnesses including tonsillitis, sleep apnea, hyperactivity, ear infections, and epilepsy.

An Africa study done in 2000, covering a six-year period and examining the health of 15,000 children, showed that the death rate from diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough was twice as high in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children.

A 2011 German study of 8,000 unvaccinated children, with medical documentation from birth to age nineteen, showed vaccinated children have at least two to five times more diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children. Read full article at VacTruth.com

Vaccines Cause Cancer

Before 1979, lymphoma was unheard of in the Western world. Since that time it has risen seven-hundred-fold and, like the outrageous and epidemic increases in autism, it is a male-biased disease. Boys are hit 2-3 times more than girls. Since 1979 we also have epidemic levels of childhood leukemia, childhood-onset schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and intellectual disability not due to the usual suspect genetic mutations.

What happened in 1979 that has led us to these horrific childhood diseases? The vaccine manufacturers changed their manufacturing. And they switched from using animal-based manufacturing to using cells taken from aborted human fetuses.

Now whether you are pro-choice or pro-life, it should make you sick to know that when you vaccinate your children with some of these vaccines, you are also injecting them with extremely high levels of human fetal DNA contaminants and a retrovirus from one of the babies that was used in the process. Those contaminants are known to cause what is known as insertional mutagenesis and autoimmunity that leads to diseases like leukemia and lymphoma, autism, childhood schizophrenia.

The FDA debated the dangers of using those cell lines for 15 years. They talked a lot about it. What they decided to do was what they call "intellectual experiments," rather than empirical experiments. If a new brake system was introduced into four cars and the engineers sat around a table and 'thought' that the brakes would be safe, would you buy that car? No! You're not stupid!

Why are we forced to vaccinate our children with unsafe vaccines that have never been tested? Only intellectual experiments have been done.

The FDA also knows the dangers of adjuvants in vaccines. There was a clinical trial that was done about a decade ago, testing what's called a "super adjuvant" in normal male volunteers. They wanted to rev up the immune system hoping that it would ultimately fight cancer. They thought that this was going to be so safe; they dosed the volunteers 10 minutes apart. And by the time the sixth volunteer got his dose, the first volunteer was begging to be euthanized.

It's called the TeGenero trials and it changed the way we are forced to develop drugs *except* for vaccines because there's no vaccine liability. Those volunteers developed what's called cytokine storm and multiple organ failure -- and yet we give to our infants and toddlers adjuvants known to be able to cause cytokine storm, without any safety testing.

I would call on the legislators here in California: No one in good conscience can possibly mandate the use of vaccines that have never been tested for safety. And I would remind the legislators and senators that they are supposed to be public servants. And if they are public servants and not in the pockets of the pharmaceutical industries, they will reject SB277. - Dr. Theresa Deisher, Sacramento, June 9, 2015

300 Articles on Vaccines Causing/Spreading Disease

Two Studies Showing a Positive Association between Autism and Childhood Vaccination

In "A Positive Association Found Between Autism Prevalence and Childhood Vaccination Uptake Across the U.S. Population" published in the May 2011 issue, pages 903-916 in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, researchers suspect that one or more environmental triggers could be a cause in the development of autism. One of those triggers might be the battery of vaccinations that young children receive.

The relationship between the proportion of children who received the recommended vaccines by age 2 years and the prevalence of autism (AUT) or speech or language impairment (SLI) in each U.S. state from 2001 and 2007 was determined. A positive and statistically significant relationship was found: The higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher the prevalence of AUT or SLI. These results suggest that there may be a link of vaccines to autism.

In "Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism Diagnosis," published in the November 2010 issue, pages 1665-1677 in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, researchers have found an association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental reports of autism.

This research included a study among boys age 3-17 years, born before 1999, who were vaccinated for hepatitis B as neonates. Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life.

Source: Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A

Forty-Six Doctors Who Explain Clearly Why Vaccines Aren't Safe or Effective